2011 Federal Election – Housing Platforms

The May 2nd Federal Election is almost upon us, and I thought it might be helpful to review the platforms in terms of housing and homelessness.  Firstly, here is what has been written on this topic by The Cooperative Housing Federation, Citizens for Public Justice, and the Canadian Housing and Renewal Association.  I want to qualify this post by saying that I hope no one will be a single issue voter, but that housing and homelessness will be one of the many issues that you use to make an informed choice.  As I am situated in Ontario, I will speak to the Liberals, Conservatives, NDP, and Greens.  I will leave analysis of the Bloc platform for those with more knowledge than myself.

Conservatives – no interest – Grade: F

No real surprise here, but housing and homelessness, and poverty in general, are not issues of concern to the Conservatives.  Minister Diane Finley has clearly stated that housing is not a federal issue in the minds of the Conservatives, and there is no plan for a national policy or program.  In the 2011 platform, the only mention of poverty is an increase in guaranteed income for seniors.  The Conservative plan for affordable housing is that as current agreements are concluded, that they will not be replaced by new ones, phasing out federal level spending on housing.

Liberals – a national framework – Grade: B+

The focus of the Liberal plan on housing and homelessness is a national Affordable Housing Framework (AHF).  This framework would allow for a focus on using funds freed up from concluded agreements to stimulate new production of social housing and renovating existing developments.  Housing would continue to be a mandate of municipalities, but there would be more access to federal-level monies

NDP – introducing legislation – Grade: A

The NDP introduced and moved Bill C-304 through 3 readings, a national housing policy, this past legislative term.  This has halted due to the dissolution of parliament, but they promise to revive it.  They also focus their housing platform on enhancing the CMHC, which has been decimated by the Conservatives.

Green Party – housing as a human right – Grade: A+

The Green Party would introduce a federal Minister of Housing, revive the CMHC, and include a clause in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms that adequate and affordable housing is a right for all Canadians.  In addition to enhancing federal spending on affordable housing, they would enhance the loan system to allow more not-for-profits to develop housing.  Lastly, other policies around guaranteed annual income and ecoEnergy expansion would make housing more affordable.

This entry was posted in In the News. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to 2011 Federal Election – Housing Platforms

  1. Richard says:

    Thanks Abe… found your contribution to be helpful in my decision making.

  2. dan says:

    I think your grades accurately capture the differences between the parties, but I think that the grades are also vastly over-inflated… methinks you’ve spent too much time grading within the university and being required to grade people higher than they deserve!

    Also, is that picture from graffiti alley behind Queen’s street in Toronto? I swear I know that spot. The art was different when I was there, but the location looks like one I walked by almost every day for a few years.

    • Abe Oudshoorn says:

      Hey Dan, not sure what they have going on at UBC in terms of inflating grades, but at Western there are no requirements around how we grade. As you know, grading is a subjective experience, so it’s impossible to say what people ‘deserve’.

      The pictures are all my own, this particular one is from an alley in London. Most of the others are from London as well, though there are some from Winnipeg and Montreal.

  3. Ron Smith says:

    Homelessness? People are homeless? Thats not what the conservatives tell me….

  4. Abby says:

    Thanks for this Abe. I found this helpful and voted accordingly.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *